| 
      
         
       
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
         | 
      
		 
		PART 
		1. Introduction, Background & Statistics 
		Today we are all challenged to claim for a new age the very principles 
		of religious freedom that shape our North American Zarathushti 
		community. The framers of The Constitution and The Bill of 
		Rights of USA and Canada could not have envisioned the vast scope of 
		religious diversity in North America at the beginning of the 21st 
		century. Religious tolerance has bred religious pluralism. Prof. Diane 
		L. Eck, Harvard University and Director of The Pluralism Project 
		declares, “the religious landscape of America has changed radically in 
		the past thirty years, but most of us have not yet begun to see the 
		dimensions and scope of that change, so gradual has it been and yet so 
		colossal”. She maintains that exposure to religious pluralism should be 
		viewed not as a threat to one’s own religious identity but as an 
		opportunity to broaden and deepen one’s own religiosity by interactions 
		with other faiths. 
		
		On June 25, 1991, a 
		Muslim imam stood in the chamber of the U.S. House of Representatives 
		and offered brief prayers as the chaplain of the day. The day a 
		Zarathushti mobed proudly recites verses from the Gathas on such an 
		occasion is the day we will surely have arrived. 
		
		Zarathushtra’s 
		Vision 
		We have demonstrated degrees of 
		reservation when it comes to revealing fundamental doctrinal aspects to 
		those who earnestly inquire about our faith. Is it fear of conveying the 
		wrong information? Is it fear of unwelcome conversion to our religion? 
		Or is it simply our lack of knowledge or interest? This hesitancy has 
		created a mystique around us as a community and around Zarathushtra’s 
		message: Can the North American society appreciate who we are and our 
		rich heritage if we do not remove this confusing mystique?
		
		Our ancient faith 
		has an astoundingly rich history and tradition, but the 
		non-proselytizing aspect has held us back from talking, discussing and 
		dialoguing with our non-Zarathushti neighbors. We readily adopt the 
		history and traditions of our American neighbors, but do we offer the 
		same reciprocity when teaching them about Zarathushtra’s Vision? 
		
		During the 1999 
		Parliament of World’s Religions meeting in Cape Town, South Africa, I 
		was approached by the Leader of the Witches delegation from Upstate New 
		York, inquiring, “I am amazed at the similarity between our two 
		religions. We worship in secret, pray in a secret language and practice 
		rituals such as worshipping the fire, and exclude non-believers from 
		participating”. I was amazed at this total misconception of our religion 
		and lost no time explaining the facts. 
		
		
		Political Perspective of Zarathushtra’s Vision 
		Some political leaders voiced 
		opinions similar to Senator Edward M. Kennedy when he commented to the 
		author, “in my interactions with Zoroastrians in US and elsewhere I am 
		struck by their zeal to better themselves and those around them while 
		maintaining the highest standards of ethics in work and social 
		interactions. I perceive the practice of the Zoroastrian religion as a 
		pure enrichment of the mind and soul”. Both Senator Kennedy and current 
		US Ambassador to Canada Paul Cellucci strongly urge the community to 
		take a more active role in the socio-political causes of their states 
		and nations, and stand for political offices, as Cellucci put it, “your 
		high code of ethics can provide a refreshing impetus to the current 
		political system”.
		
		Understanding of 
		Zarathushtra’s Vision by Arts & Cultural Bodies. 
		Dr. Susan Bean, Curator of the Peabody Essex Museum of Salem, 
		Massachusetts, voiced the opinion of most arts and cultural entities 
		about lack of artifacts, literature, art, music, and dance material for 
		displays and promotion; also noting, “a strong adherence to the moral 
		tenets of the faith by its practitioners, which distinguishes them for 
		their willingness to accommodate without compromising their values”. 
		[The museum has ample displays of cultural and trade interactions of the 
		Parsis with westerners]. 
		
		Institutes of 
		Higher Learning in North America 
		Many universities that were founded 
		and funded by religious groups in times prior to the 19th century made a 
		strong case for religion to be part of the daily campus environment of 
		the time. Those that did not have an ecclesiastical foundation showed a 
		reluctance to emphasize the study of religion, citing separation of 
		state and religion till the early 1920s.
		
		In time universities 
		and colleges such as Harvard University (1926), Columbia University 
		(1924), Wellesley College (1928) began to take a more overt approach to 
		the study of Christian and non-Christian religions, particularly the 
		philosophies. The study of the Zarathushti doctrine was initially 
		explored as part of Iranian Studies at Harvard and Columbia 
		Universities. Gradually the study of comparative and nascent religions 
		made its way into institutes of higher learning nationwide. 
		
		Today, 22 
		universities and 42 colleges have undergraduate courses in varying 
		degrees in the study of the Zarathushti faith; 15 universities and 37 
		colleges have graduate courses; and 9 universities and 7 colleges have 
		doctorate or post-doctorate studies. Zoroastrian faith. Of the students 
		of religious studies at 22 universities and 42 colleges about .04% 
		specialize in Indo-Iranian. More than 97% of the researchers and 
		students in the study are non-Zoroastrians. Very little subject 
		concentration at all levels is doctrinal. As of today, there is no Chair 
		established in any institute of higher learning in North America 
		strictly for study and research of the Zarathushti faith. 
		
		
		Zarathushtra’s Vision in Higher Education & Cultural Organizations 
		The general understanding of 
		Zarathushtra’s Vision of most of the Top Officials of Higher Education 
		and Cultural Bodies (museums, arts councils, libraries, etc.) 
		interviewed, seemed to be based on the importance given to the highest 
		standards of morality, ethics, hard work, and charity.
		
		Their observations 
		of the concept, status and promotion of Zarathushtra’s Vision are 
		summarized as follows: 
		
		
		Doctrine – Rituals – Traditions & Cultural Heritage
		
			- 
			
			The fundamental 
			‘reflective’ element of the message of the prophet;  
			- 
			
			the freedom to 
			think and act without the encumbrance of a set of rigid rules;  
			- 
			
			its relevance to 
			society today;  
			- 
			
			the ease of 
			adjusting the ceremonial aspects to suit the exigencies of life in 
			the new world;  
			- 
			
			the doctrinal 
			and ritualistic perspective of the religion is mainly tied to 
			Indo-Iranian traditions and cultures, and the non-proselytizing 
			stance of the faith’s practitioners discourages a potentially larger 
			number of people interested in Zarathushtra’s message.  
			- 
			
			The community in 
			North America should establish trusts that give scholarships for 
			undergraduate, graduate and doctorate students; grants for research; 
			establish chairs in institutes of higher learning; facilitate the 
			availability of informational manuscripts, books, articles, art, 
			literature and significant artifacts; make information available in 
			all learning institutes, libraries, museums and  art councils. This 
			priority groundwork is essential for institutes of higher learning 
			and cultural organizations to find further resources.  
			- 
			
			The grassroots 
			community itself has to make concentrated efforts to supplement the 
			efforts of its organizational body – FEZANA should promote the 
			understanding of our heritage at all levels. Display artifacts and 
			distribute information at local town and county 
			affairs and facilitate the usage of authentic data in schools, 
			libraries and museums.  
		 
		
		Two Presidents of 
		ivy-league universities have given a positive indication of a 
		substantial increase in the courses offered currently relating to 
		Zarathushtra’s Vision within their Middle Eastern Studies Department. 
		Twelve heads of departments and 17 professors for Middle Eastern and 
		Comparative Religion Studies have volunteered to prioritize this study 
		for a period varying from 1 to 8 semesters as a starting approach. 
		
		Past President of 
		Brown University and currently President of Carnegie Foundation, NY, 
		Prof. Vartan Garabedian found few Zarathushties or non-Zarathushties 
		applying for loans or scholarships for Zarathushti studies. 
		
		A cursory study of 
		comments by Zarathushti and non-Zarathushti students who have taken up 
		Zarathushti studies as part of their course or research program pointed 
		out lack of scholarships and grants as incentives for pursuing studies 
		in the field. Some young mobeds and Zoroastrian students were 
		disheartened by the rejection they faced when they approached funding 
		organizations for further studies in religion. 
		
		The governing bodies 
		of our two nations in North America do not profess to favor certain 
		faiths to the exclusion of others. We Zarathushties, have an obligation 
		to ourselves and to our respective countries to continue educating 
		ourselves, as we venture to educate our children, our neighbors, our 
		community, and our fellow human beings.  
		
		PART 
		2. 
		Forthcoming work will center on comments, critiques & suggestions from 
		leaders of institutions of higher learning and cultural organizations. 
		We will continue to evaluate our standing in today’s American community 
		and plan for the future. The suggestions to us should give us a basis to 
		work towards a strong and viable plan for presenting Zarathushtra’s 
		Vision to all Americans – Zarathushti and Non-Zarathusti. 
		 
		
		Cultivating a Good 
		Mind coheres with the Greek playwright Ovid’s thought that, "A faithful 
		study of the liberal arts humanizes character and permits it not to be 
		cruel" [Ovid, Epistolae ex Ponto, c. A.D. 10]. We see the reflective 
		concerns of a Youth making her way in the liberal arts. 
		 
		
			
				
				
				
				[i] 
				This article posted on vohuman.org on January 13, 2006 first 
				appeared in the FEZANA journal of Winter 2002.  It was included 
				as a part of a series articles featured under the theme 
				“Zarathushtra’s Vision in a lifetime’s Learning.” That issue of 
				the FEZANA journal was guest edited by Dr. Mehrborzin Soroushian 
				and Dr. Natalie Vania, courtesy of whom this article has been 
				made available for posting on vohuman.  
		 
		 |